Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188029 (ALL)

SUDHIR KUMAR TIWARI AND 111 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/14535/2025 · 2025-12-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14535 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned state counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- "i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities to take into consideration of the service period spent by the petitioners, while undergoing training as per the circular dated 08.11.1965 (contained as annexure no. 1 to this writ petition) in the service period of the petitioners, in the interest of justice. ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to provide one additional increment after completion of the 19 years of service to the petitioners according to the Government Order dated 02.12.2000 (contained as annexure no. 2 to this writ petition), in the interest of justice. iii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to consider the claim of the petitioners and provide one additional increment after completion of the 19 years of satisfactory services to the petitioners, in the light of the judgments of Ghanshyam Tiwari vs. State of UP. and others (Writ A No. 44330 of 2013) decided on 7.9.2012, Virendra Kumar And Another vs. State of U.P. and 3 others (Writ A No. 48601 of 2015) decided on 26.05.2016," Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anjani Kumar Shukla, Mukesh Kumar Tewari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sudhir Kumar Tiwari And 111 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 3. Since petitioners' grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to make fresh individual representation before opposite party No. 2 i.e. Director General of Police, Lucknow, U.P. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 4. The petition stands disposed of. December 16, 2025 prabhat WRIA No. 14535 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench