Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188017 (ALL)

MANOJ KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. BASIC EDUCATION AND 2 OTHERS

/14534/2025 · 2025-12-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14534 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Mr. Shivam Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 & 3. Present petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus. commanding the Respondent No. 3 (The Finance & Accounts Officer (Basic Education), Raebareli) to forthwith compute and release the entire accumulated amount of the General Provident Fund (GPF) payable to the Petitioner for his service period from 21.03.1992 to 30.06.1998 in District Raebareli. II. Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the Respondents to pay statutory interest on the delayed GPF amount, from the date of the Petitioner's retirement (31.03.2023) till the date of actual payment. III. Direct the Opposite Party No. 3 (The Finance and Accounts Officer (Basic Education), District Raebareli) to decide the petitioner's representation dated 14.05.2025 and ensure payment of the admitted GPF amount during the pendency of the present writ petition." Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that G.P.F. book of the petitioner has not been sent at the place of transfer. He submits that interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court is pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the respondent no.3 within Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shivam Sharma Manoj Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Basic Education And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) fifteen days and direct the respondent no.3 to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the submission aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent no.3/the Finance and Accounts Officer (Basic Education), Distr4ict Raebareli, within fifteen days and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.3 is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within further period of four weeks. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. December 16, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 14534 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench