HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9494 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Firoz Ahmad Khan, learned for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.215 of 2022, under sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 504 IPC, P.S. Kotwali Bikapur, District Ayodhya. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that allegations were levelled that all of accused named in the FIR has attacked son of informant which resulted in his death. Subsequently, after investigation name of applicant alongwith two other co accused Shobha Devi and Vandana were discharged and final report was filed in their favour. Subsequently on the basis of statements all three persons were summoned in exercise of power under Section 319 Cr.P.C. It is argued that one of the co accused Sobha Devi has been enlarged on bail by this Court. 4. Learned AGA and learned for the informant have opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that the final report was filed in favour of the applicant and the fact that fact witnesses have been examined, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Bhawan Yadav, Anil Kumar Pandey, Ganga Prasad Mishra, Ramakar Shukla, Vikas Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Firoz Ahmad Khan Bhola Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s) jail since 30.3.2024 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Bhola Yadav be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 7. The trial court shall conclude the matter expeditiously. November 18, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 9494 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench