SANT RAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOUSING and URBAN and ORS.
WRIA/13332/2018 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188014 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188014 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13332 of 2018 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 16, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Narayan Yadav, Ram Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Puneet Chandra, Ratnesh Chandra (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Sant Ram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Housing And Urban And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench