Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18801 (PNJ)

POOJA v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

CWP/2413/2025 · 2025-03-26

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-2413-2025 (O&M). -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 286 CWP-2413-2025 (O&M). Date of Decision: 26.03.2025. POOJA AND OTHERS ... Petitioner(s) Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. Present: Ms. Nalin Singhal, Advocate, (Through Video Conference) for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bali, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondent No.1/UOI. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in present writ petition is for directing the respondents to issue order of regularization of services of the petitioners on their respective posts of Accounts Clerk/Sales Persons. 2 Ms. Yashika Walia, Advocate, for Mr. Rose Gupta, Advocate, enters appearance and files memo of appearance on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3. RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.03.27 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-2413-2025 (O&M). -2- 3 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment dated 12.12.2023 passed in CWP No.17666 of 2023, titled as ‘Rakesh Kumar and others Vs. Union of India and others’ along with other cases and can be disposed of in similar terms. 4 Learned counsel appearing for the respondents do not dispute the same and submits that the present petition be disposed of accordingly. 5 The present petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 12.12.2023 passed in CWP No.17666 of 2023, titled as ‘Rakesh Kumar and others Vs. Union of India and others.’ March 26, 2025. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) raj arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.03.27 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document