- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:12411 WP No. 6083 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 6083 OF 2025 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: M/S R.C. INDIA, NO. 213, 1ST FLOOR, 4TH MAIN ROAD, CHAMARAJPETE, BENGALURU - 560 018, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, NIJALINGEGOWDA, S/O SHIVALINGEGOWDA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AKARSH KUMAR GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES (SSI AND MINES), 1ST FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE KARNATAKA STATE MINERALS CORPORATION LIMITED (AN UNDERTAKING OF GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA), T.T.M.C 'A' BLOCK, 5TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:12411 WP No. 6083 of 2025 3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR E-PROCUREMENT CELL 4TH FLOOR, SRI. ARAVINDA BHAVAN, MYTHICAL SOCIETY COMPOUND, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHI V, HCGP FOR R1; SMT. MONICA PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO CONSIDER THE BID OF THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNX-D PURSUANT TO E-TENDER NO.KSMCL/2024-25/SE0031/CAL-2 ISSUED BY R-2 VIDE ANNX-C AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Heard Sri. Akarsh Kumar Gowda, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Smt. Spoorthi V., learned HCGP appearing for respondent No.1, Smt. Monica Patil, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 and have perused the material on record. 2. The learned counsel for the second respondent, Smt. Monica Patil submits that the petition is rendered - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:12411 WP No. 6083 of 2025 infructuous, as the bid of the petitioner has been duly considered. 3. This is accepted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 4. In that light, the petition is disposed as having become infructuous leaving open all the remedies available to the petitioner in law, in the event of need. 5. Learned counsel, at this juncture, submits that the EMD amount would be refunded, learned counsel appearing for the second respondent submits that the action would be taken in accordance with law. 6. Recording the said submission and with the aforesaid observations, the petition stands disposed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22 CT: BHK