Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187990 (ALL)

JAI RAM AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. ENVIRONMENT, FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

/14497/2025 · 2025-12-16

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14497 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State counsel for opposite parties. 2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus Commanding the Opposite Parties to provide the pension along with all consequential benefits after included/added the service rendered by the petitioner under the capacity of daily wages as qualifying service, in terms of judgment dated 02.09.2019 passed in Civil Appeal No.6798/2019 (Prem Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others). (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus Commanding the Opposite Parties to provide the pension along with all consequential benefits after added the past services rendered by the petitioners as like in the case of Mohd. Owasis Hashmi and Ram Gopal Singh. Passed in writ A NO, 1367 of 20121. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : S.P. Singh Somvanshi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Jai Ram And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Environment, Forest And Climate Change Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) (iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus Commanding the Opposite Parties to provide the pension along with all consequential benefits after included/added the service rendered by the petitioners under the capacity of daily wages as qualifying service, in terms of judgment dated 04.11.2025 in writ A no. 731 of 2024 (Jai Ram Sharma Vs. state of U. P. and others, along with others connected writ petitioners)" 3. Since consideration of petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh individual representation before concerned authority. In case such representations are filed, the same shall be decided in the light of aforesaid judgment in case the same is applicable within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 16, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 14497 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench