IBRAR AHMED v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/11734/2025 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187986 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187986 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11734 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA appearing for the State- respondents.
2. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner states that she does not intend to press the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue appropriate remedy as may be available to her under law.
3. Learned counsel for respondents has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. December 16, 2025 Reena/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suchita Tripathi, Raj Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Ibrar Ahmed .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench