Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9756-DB WPHC No. 17 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.M.NADAF W.P.H.C. NO. 17 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
SMT. ROOPA C PATIL, W/O CHANDRA GOWDA PATIL, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESIDING AT FLAT NO G1, G2, BANNIMANTAP C LAYOUT, MYSURU-570 015. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GIRISHA N R, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATION HOUSE OFFICER, HIREHADAGALI POLICE STATION, HADAGALI, VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT-583 216.
2.
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT-583 275.
3.
MR VIRUPAKSHA B, S/O BASAVANAYAPPA, AGED MAJOR, RESIDENT OF HARALIHALLI, HAVERI TALUK, HAVERI-581 112. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. THEJESH P, HCGP FOR R1 AND R2)
Digitally signed by K G RENUKAMBA Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9756-DB WPHC No. 17 of 2025
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO PRODUCE THE PETITIONERS HUSBAND, CHANDRAGOWDA PATIL, S/O.
SOMANA GOWDA BEFORE THIS HON’BLE COURT AND RELEASE HIM FORTHWITH AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
0ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO)
On the last date of hearing, we had directed the petitioner and her husband to be present before the Court.
2. Today, the petitioner and the husband of the petitioner as identified by the counsel for the petitioner are present in the Court.
3. The Court has interacted with the Mr.Chandra Gowda Patil, the husband of the petitioner, who states that, he has returned from Guttal, Haveri District, this morning after called by the police. He also states that, he shall now go to his
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9756-DB WPHC No. 17 of 2025
house at Bannimantapa ‘C’ Layout, Mysuru, where the petitioner resides.
4. In view of this submission, learned counsel for the petitioner states that, nothing further survives in the writ petition.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition be closed.
Sd/- (V KAMESWAR RAO) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20