Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18798 (AP)

SRI KANYAKA PARAMESWARI AMMAVARI DEVASTHANAM, GUNTUR v. DARAKSHARAM SIVARAMA KRISHNAIAH, GUNTUR DIST & 2 OTHERS

CRP/1877/2017 · 2025-08-10

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010259072017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1877/2017 Between: 1. SRI KANYAKA PARAMESWARI AMMAVARI DEVASTHANAM, GUNTUR, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, YETUKURU ROAD, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. DARAKSHARAM SIVARAMA KRISHNAIAH GUNTUR DIST 2 OTHERS, S/O. LATE SAMBAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O. YETUKURU VILLAGE, GUNTUR RURAL MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DRAKSHARAM SUBBA RAO, S/O. LATE SAMBAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O. YETUKURU VILLAGE, GUNTUR RURAL MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. DRAKSHARAM KOTESWARA RAO, S/O. LATE SAMBAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PRIVATE TAXI-DRIVER, R/O. YETUKURU VILLAGE, GUNTUR RURAL MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PADMAVATHI PADNAVIS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. B NARASIMHA SARMA 2. JUPUDI V K YAGNADUTT The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1877 of 2017 ORDER: 1. Though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. 2. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:11.08.2025 Dvs THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N 75 CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1877 of 2017 Date: 11.08.2025 Dvs