Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187979 (ALL)

ARVIND @ TOBO v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/948/2025 · 2025-11-11

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 948 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 147 of 2024, under sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Sections 3/4 POCSO Act, P.S. Purwa, District Unnao. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of the informant was missing and was enticed by the applicant. Subsequently in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. the victim did not support the prosecution story and stated that she knew the applicant for last two months and thereafter she had gone to Ludhiana where they stayed as husband and wife. The tentative age of the victim is around 16 years. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the statement of the victim, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 8.10.2024 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Arvind @ Tobo be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jayveer Rajput, Smriti Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Arvind @ Tobo .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 11, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 948 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench