Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187958 (ALL)

GHANSHYAM AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS

/1106/2025 · 2025-12-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 1106 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 3.Learned counsel for petitioner prays for and is permitted to implead Consolidation Commissioner, U.P., Lucknow as party during course of the day. 4. All the petitioners in the present case are villagers of gram Ghisigarh, Saray Manik, District Raebareli and are opposing the consolidation operations which are being carried on. 5. They have submitted that the villagers are facing great hardships at the hands of the consolidation authorities and it is for various other reasons that they have prayed that consolidation operations may be stopped and notification U/S 6 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holding Act be issued by the State Government. 6. It has been submitted that a representation was handed over to the District Magistrate to be forwarded to the Consolidation Officer and had made a prayer that the said representation may be decided. 7. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand opposes the writ petition but does not dispute the aforesaid facts. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Modanwal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ghanshyam And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 8. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners to move fresh representation to the Consolidation Commissioner within two weeks from today and after receiving the same the said authority shall decide the same expeditiously, say, within a period of two months thereafter in accordance with law. 9. It is made clear that this Court is not averted to the merits of the case. December 16, 2025 Ravi/ WRIB No. 1106 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench