Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187950 (ALL)

RAM AUTAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. PANCHAYAT RAJ and ORS.

WPIL/847/2019 · 2025-12-16

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 847 of 2019 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this PIL. 3. We have perused the pleadings as well as relief clause. 4. We leave it open for the petitioner to pursue such other remedies as may be available in law, if there is a cause. The PIL stands disposed of accordingly. December 16, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kishori Lal Yadav, Akshaya Kumar Katiyar, Kripashankar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Yogendra Nath Yadav (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Ram Autar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Panchayat Raj And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench