IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11788/2025 Decided on: 08.08.2025 Narender Singh …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Sahil Thakur, Advocate vice Ms. Shalini Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for disposal at this stage. 2. Petitioner had instituted Narender Singh Mohil Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 regarding grant of promotional increments to the post of Head Teacher. The writ petition was disposed of with direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide petitioner’s representation dated 27.06.2024 (Annexure P-4), in accordance with law within stipulated period. The respondents 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 CWP No.12472/2024 decided on 30.11.2024 2 decided the said representation on 12.06.2025 and rejected the same. Petitioner feels aggrieved against the said office order, hence, preferred this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the case of the petitioner and reliefs prayed for by him have already been adjudicated upon in Surya Prabha & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.3 The impugned rejection conveyed by the respondents vide office letter dated 12.06.2025 (Annexure P-5) is not in consonance with the decision rendered in Surya Prabha2. 4. A perusal of the impugned decision as contained in Annexure P-5 reflects that Surya Prabha2 was not applied while deciding the representation of the petitioner. For that reason alone, the impugned decision as communicated in office letter dated 12.06.2025 is quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner afresh, in accordance with law, keeping in view of Surya Prabha2. This exercise shall be undertaken within six weeks. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 08th August, 2025(rohit) 3 CWP No 5390/2024 decided on 28.05.2025