Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187923 (ALL)

RENU DEVI MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. BAL VIKAS SEVA EVAM PUSHTAHAR VIBHAG LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

/14518/2025 · 2025-12-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14518 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayer:- "(i) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding and directing to the opp. parties to consider the representation dated 18.11.2025 of the petitioner by providing the benefit of promotion on the post of Anganwadi Worker of Village Gopalpur Madhaiya-II, Block Lambhua, District Sultanpur, by speaking and reasoned order, which is contained as annexure No. 1 with this writ petition. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding directing the opp. parties to consider the promotion of the petitioner from the post of Anganwadi Sahaika to Anganwadi Worker at Village Gopalpur Madhaiya-II, Block Lambhua, District Sultanpur according to guidelines the 50% of vacancies would be filled up by promotion and remaining 50% vacancies filled up by direct recruitment under the policy decision making by Govt. of Uttar Pradesh under guidelines issued by the Ministry of Women and Child Development of the Govt. of India dated 15.09.2015, which is contained as Annexure No. 5 with this writ petition." 3. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party No. 5 i.e. District Programme Officer, District Sultanpur. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 4. The petition stands disposed of. December 16, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Renu Devi Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Bal Vikas Seva Evam Pushtahar Vibhag Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench