1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.589 of 2022 Date of Decision : 15.09.2025 The Karloti Gram Sewa Cooperative Society Limited …… Petitioner Versus Reeta Devi and others ……Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral) Challenge, in the case at hand, is to the impugned order dated 23.10.2019 appended along-with present petition as Annexure P-5. 2. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 submits that in furtherance to the aforesaid impugned judgment surcharge proceedings were initiated which have culminated. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment in the surcharge proceedings so conducted, appropriate appeals were preferred by the parties before the appropriate authority. 3. In view of the aforesaid, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the present proceedings. Accordingly, the present petition has become 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 infructuous. The petition is, therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Bipin Chander Negi) September 15, 2025 (KS) Judge