Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187903 (ALL)

JOSEPHINE NAVITT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. BASIC EDUCATION AND 4 OTHERS

/14521/2025 · 2025-12-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14521 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Uday Veer Singh learned counsel for the respondent nos.4 & 5, Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and Mr. Brijendra Singh, learned counsel for the State and perused the material on record. Instant petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:- "I. Issue, writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties to provide to compute the Gratuity of the petitioner as per Government Order dated 23-11-1994. II. Issue, writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing opposite party no.4 to decide the representation of the petitioner. III. Any other suitable order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem, fit, just and proper under the circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioners." Learned counsel for the petitioner, after argument at length, submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court is pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the respondent no.4 within fifteen days and direct the respondent no.4 to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sachin Kumar Mishra, Rishi Raj Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Josephine Navitt .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Deptt. Basic Education And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the submission aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent no.4 /District Basic Education Officer, District Gonda within fifteen days and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.4 is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. December 16, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 14521 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench