SURAMPUDI NAGA SRINIVAS v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/5584/2025 · 2025-06-16
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18788 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18788 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
»■ APHC010260112025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WE fs *01 TUESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE ij?
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE % PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5584 OF 2025 Between: Surampudi Naga Srinivas, S/o. Ramana, Age 35 years Vegavaram Village Jangareddygudem Mandal, West Godavari District. R/o. D-No ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1 AND
1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by S.H.O Town Police Station, Jangareddigudem Jangareddigudem, West Godavari District through the Public Prosecutor, Honble High Court at Amaravathi Rep. For the State of Andhra Pradesh.
2. Medida Sudha Rani, D/o. Sanjeeva Rao, Age 36 Years Tadepalligudem Town, West Godavari District ...RESPONDENT/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, Court of Andhra Pradesh. High ... RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINT
Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court ^pleased to call for records in SC.ST. SC. No. 16 of 2021 on the file of the ’ Mfc'tole Vni Addl. District & Sessions Judge, West Godavari District Eluru, and^yashithe same against the Petitioners/Accused herein lA 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including personal appearance of the petitioner/accused in SC.ST. SC. No. 16 of 2021 on the file of the Hon’ble VIII Addl. District & Sessions Judge, West Godavari District, Eluru. This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V S R S NAIDU Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Additional Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 The Court made the following ORDER : Public
/ / / / ■' APHC010260112025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5584/2025 Between: Surampudi Naga Srinivas ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.VSRSNAIDU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
ORDER: The present Criminal petition is filed seeking to quash SC ST SC No.16 of 2021 on the file of the learned Special Judge for Trial Cases of SC/ST (POA) Cases Court & VIII Additional Sessions Judge, West Godavari District District & Eluru. Crime No.71 of under Sections 420, 506 R/w 34 of IPC and Section 3 (1) (s) of the Scheduled and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. 2018 was registered for the alleged offences Castes
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, appearing virtually^ submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. It f is submitted that the petitioner had earlier filed Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act close associate of the 2'^'^ respondent, and I a complaint under i 1881, against a out of vengeance, the present complaint has been lodged to falsely implicate petitioner. It is further submitted that, the even as per the contents of the complaint and the statements of the witnesses, no offence is made out against the petitioner.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor respondent-State. Perused the material available appearing virtually, appearing for the 1 St on record.
4. On perusal of the record, it is evident that the statements of the witnesses prima facie disclose allegations against the petitioner.
5. However, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, deems it appropriate to dispose off the criminal petition, leaving it open to the petitioner to raise ail grounds urged in this petition at the appropriate stage when the matter is taken up for hearing before the trial Court. With the above observations, the Criminal Petition is
6.
disposed off. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- K.J.RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR f //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Special Judge for Trail Cases of SC/ST (POA) Cases Cum VIII Additional District & Sessions Judge Eluru W.G District.
2. One CC to SRI. V S R S NAIDU Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravathi [OUT]
4. THREE CD COPIES TAC
\ HIGH COURT DATED:17/06/2025
ORDER CRLP 5584/2025 ^0 6SEP 2025 )s) Ss^Qujrcnt SectiojjXi^ DISPOSING THE CRLP PETITION