MUIDURRAHMAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR BARABANKI and 2 OTHERS
SAPLD/132/2017 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187873 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187873 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW SECOND APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 132 of 2017 Court No. - 19 HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Case is called out in the revised call.
2. None is present for the appellant even in the revised list.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. December 16, 2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Mohd. Istkhar Ansari, Syed Aftab Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : Aftab Ahmad, Ram Kumar Singh (Prashant Kumar,J.) Muidurrahman .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Collector Barabanki And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench