LAXMI NARAYAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/14355/2025 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187865 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187865 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14355 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to repatriate petitioner from Dial 112 Project to his parent department i.e. Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC) in pursuance of order dated 30.01.2023.
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Deputy Inspector General of Police (Karmik), D.G.P. Headquarter, Lucknow. In case such representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. December 16, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Laxmi Narayan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench