Gadi Venkateswaramma Alias Deena v. State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/17120/2020 · 2025-08-11
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18786 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18786 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010259772020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17120/2020 Between:
1. GADI VENKATESWARAMMA ALIAS DEENA, W/O.DURGA RAO AGE 32 YEARS, OCE MILK BUSINESS RESIDENT OF D.NO.19-40, SANJEEVAIAH NAGAR
YANAMALAKUDURU, PENAMALURU MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME) STATE SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ELURU RANGE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P.
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH
4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PENAMALURU CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER/INCHARGE OFFICER, PENAMALURU PS, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P.
6. VEERAMALLU VENKATESH, VEERAMALLU VENKATESH, SUB- INSPECTOR, PENAMALURU PS VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction or Writ, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent nos. 3 to 4 to take appropriate action on the complaint dt.04.06.2020 against the 6th respondent and others including registering FIR and necessary disciplinary proceedings to forbid the concerned police from unlawful actions against the petitioner and his family members and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent to provide necessary protection to the petitioner and her family members in continuing her livelihood of feeding her cattle on the river bank of Krishna and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N N SOMENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17120 of 2020
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to pass an order or direction or Writ, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent Nos. 3 to 4 to take appropriate action on the complaint dt.04.06.2020 against the 6th respondent and others including registering FIR and necessary disciplinary proceedings to forbid the concerned police from unlawful actions against the petitioner and his family members and pass…”
2. None represented for the petitioner.
3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that after conducting enquiry on the complaint of the petitioner dated 04.06.2020, no offence is made out against the unofficial respondent and others, so, no crime has been registered against them.
4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no
order as to costs. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before appropriate forum.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 12.08.2025. UPS
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.17120 of 2020
Dated.12.08.2025
UPS
66