Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.10462 of 2025
Decided on: 1st July, 2025 _________________________________________________________________ Pradeep Kumar
....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. & Ors.
…Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Vinay Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. L.N.Sharma,
Additional Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. L.N.Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
Petitioner’s case is that on completion of normal tenure as Lecturer (English) at GSSS Tindi, District Lahaul & Spiti, he preferred representation on 03.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) to respondent No.1, seeking his transfer to a station of his choice. Petitioner’s grievance is that his aforesaid representation has not been decided by the competent
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
- 2 - authority till date.
3.
Looking to the limited grievance of the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent /Competent Authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law and as per applicable notification/policy within a period of three weeks from today. The decision so taken be also communicated to the petitioner.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge July 1, 2025 R.Atal