Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187828 (ALL)

RAJAN KANNAUJIYA @ RAJENDRA KANNAUJIYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. /PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

/10541/2025 · 2025-12-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10541 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Sri Abhishek Chaubey, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for opposite party no.2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed with the prayer to quash the charge sheet arising out of crime no.236 of 2016 (State vs. Rajan Kanaujia) under sections 323, 504, 506, 498-A IPC and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Husainganj, District Lucknow as well as summoning order dated 25.4.2017 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, District Lucknow in Criminal Case No.13815 of 2017 as well as the entire proceedings in the aforesaid case. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.5 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Km. Saumya Tiwari, Anoop Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajan Kannaujiya @ Rajendra Kannaujiya .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. /Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicant, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 16, 2025 Pks A482 No. 10541 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench