TAUFEEQUE @ BHURJI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO.
/2156/2025 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187820 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187820 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2156 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that applicant is involved in as many as 3 cases and in all the cases, he has already been granted bail by court below. It is further submitted that on account of requirement of two individual surety in each case, the applicant has not been released on bail. The details of the cases are as follows :- (i) Case Crime No. 276 of 2024 under Sections 3/5/8 of Cow Slaughter Act, Police Station-B.K.T., District-Lucknow. (ii) Case Crime No. 76 of 2025 under Sections 3/5/8 of Cow Slaughter Act, Police Station-B.K.T., District-Lucknow. (iii) Case Crime No. 121 of 2025 under Sections 3/5/8 of Cow Slaughter Act and 4/25 Arms Act, Police Station-B.K.T., District-Lucknow.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the decision of Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vicky Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh in Special Leave to Appeal No. 8914-8915 of 2018 decided on 29.10.2018, in which, Hon'ble Apex Court has passed the order directing the petitioner to execute one personal bond and two sureties which shall hold good for all the 31 cases. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Shahid Akhtar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Taufeeque @ Bhurji .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
4. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond and two heavy sureties (one surety should be of family member of the applicant) each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned in any one case. The said surety shall be valid in all above mentioned cases, where the bail order has been passed.
5. With the above observations, this application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. is finally disposed of. December 16, 2025 Karan NA528 No. 2156 of 2025 2 (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) Digitally signed by :- KARAN KUMAR RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench