Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:21509
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 10679 of 2025
Decided on: 07.07.2025 Devi Dass
… Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others
… Respondents
Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Ms. Sangeeta Vasudeva, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Senior Panel
Counsel, for respondent-UOI.
: Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Addl. AG for
respondent-State.
: Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate for State
of Rajasthan.
: Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, Advocate for
BBMB.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Notice. Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, learned Senior Panel Counsel, Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, Mr. K.B. Khajuria, learned Counsel and Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, learned Counsel, accept notice on behalf of the respective respondents.
2.
On the request of learned Counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that in the event of the
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
2025:HHC:21509 petitioner filing a fresh representation to respondent No. 4, within a period of six weeks from today relating to the issue raised in this petition, let the same be decided by competent Authority within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, after hearing the parties. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge July 07, 2025 (narender)