RAJKUMAR BUDHARMAL GURUBAKSHANI v. NANDLAL BUDHARMAL GURUBAKSHANI
CA/6465/2014 · 2025-03-05
Shri S G Chapalgaonkar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18781 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18781 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 66-ca-6465-2014.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6465 OF 2014 IN SA/334/2003 RAJKUMAR BUDHARMAL GURUBAKSHANI VERSUS NANDLAL BUDHARMAL GURUBAKSHANI … Mr. P. P. Mandlik h/f Mr. T. K. Sant, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Mukul S. Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1i to 1iv. ...
CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATED : 05th MARCH, 2025. P.C.:-
1. Heard.
2. By this application, applicant seeks to bring on record legal representatives of respondent-Nandlal Budharmal Gurubakshani as stipulated in paragraph no.3.
3. Mr. Kulkarni, learned Advocate has caused appearance for legal representatives.
4. Considering averments in application and facts that application is tendered within limitation, there is no impediment in allowing the same. Hence, following order:
ORDER a. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer Clauses (B) and (C). b. Amendment to be carried out within a period of three days from today. c. Place Second Appeal on 19.03.2025 for further consideration.
(S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR) JUDGE Devendra/March-2025 2025:BHC-AUG:6555