VINAY KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
/10608/2025 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187794 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187794 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10608 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the entire proceeding of case crime No. 142 of 2024 Case No. 41615/2025 under Section 498A, 323, 504, 352 I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station- Kakori, District-Lucknow, State Vs. Vinay Kumar Yadav and others pending in the court of Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division)/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Room No. 20, Lucknow as well as to quash the charge-sheet No. 01 dated 01.07.2024 as well as summoning order dated 29.04.2025 in case crime No. 142 of 2024 Case No. 41615 of 2025 under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 352 I.P.C. and 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station- Kakori, District-Lucknow on the basis of compromise dated 16.09.2025. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that now parties have entered into compromise, therefore, this Court may please to quash the proceeding for which learned AGA has no objection. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Court below as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jai Singh, Pankaj Kumar, Santosh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vinay Kumar Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it within two weeks, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise within two weeks. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8.
For a period of one month, the entire proceeding of Case Crime No. 142 of 2024 under Section 498A, 323, 504, 352 I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station-Kakori, District-Lucknow pending in the Court of Additional Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division)/Additional chief Judicial Magistrate Room No. 20, Lucknow, shall remain stayed. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicants, if any, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 16, 2025 Karan A482 No. 10608 of 2025 2 (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) Digitally signed by :- KARAN KUMAR RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench