Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18779 (HP)

MAAN SINGH v. DR YS PARMAR UNIVERSITY OF HORTICULUTRE AND FORESTRY

CWP/6987/2025 · 2025-05-22

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.6987 of 2025 Date of Decision: 22.5.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Maan Singh ……...Petitioner Versus Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry …....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Dheeraj Kanwar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that his client would be content and satisfied in case direction is issued to the respondents to consider and decide representation (Annexure P-10) of the petitioner in light of judgment dated 25.9.2023, passed in CWP No. 4469 of 2022, titled as “Ishwar Dyal v. Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry Nauni, (alongwith connected matters). Learned counsel for the respondents is not averse to the aforesaid innocuous prayer made by the petitioner. 2. Having perused aforesaid judgment sought to be relied upon vis-à-vis issue raised in the petition at hand, this Court finds that issue raised in the instant petition already stands adjudicated in the aforesaid judgment rendered by this Court and as such, no - 2 - prejudice would be caused to either of the parties in case respondents are directed to consider and decide case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment. 3. Consequently, in view of the above, present petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider and decide pending representation (Annexure P-10) of the petitioner in light of Ishwar Dyal’s case (supra), expeditiously, preferably, within six weeks. In case, petitioner is found to be similarly situate to the petitioner in the aforesaid judgment, he would be extended similar benefits. Needless to say, authority concerned while doing the needful in terms of the instant order shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass speaking order thereupon. All pending applications stand disposed of. May 22, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge