HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5122 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned AGA has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the final report has also been submitted in favour of the petitioner and as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner do not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 18, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lalji Yadav, Vishnu Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Laxmi Narayan Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench