SMT. AARZOO AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/34149/2025 · 2025-09-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187768 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187768 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34149 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. By way of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful living of petitioners, has been sought.
3. Upon perusal of the pleadings, this Court finds that this second writ petition, earlier petitioners had approached this court through Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.6844 of 2025 in which petitioners were granted protection for celebration of Eid-ul-Zuha (Bakrid) vide order dated
23.5.2025.
4. Through the instant petition, petitioners again approached this Hon'ble Court for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful living. This court does not find any serious threat perception to the petitioners and, therefore, there is no requirement of passing any order for providing police protection to them. There is no material or reason for this Court to conclude that the petitioners' life and liberty are at peril. There is not even an iota of evidence to evince that private respondents (relatives of either of the petitioners) are likely to cause physical or mental assault to the petitioners.
5. In a deserving case, the Court can provide security to the couple, but cannot lend them the support they have sought. If any person misbehaves or manhandles them, the Courts and police authorities Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rizwan Ullah Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Aarzoo And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
are there to come to their rescue.
6. Needless to observe that petitioners have already moved a representation before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Saharanpur and in case the concerned police finds a real threat perception, he will do the needful in accordance with law.
7. In view thereof, no case made out for seeking indulgence of the Court over the prayer as made in the petition, hence, the same is hereby dismissed. September 25, 2025 Rakesh WRIC No. 34149 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad