ARUN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 9 OTHERS
/11882/2025 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187766 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187766 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11882 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. Upon perusal of the documents, we are of the view that the petitioner has obtained an injunction against Respondents No. 9 and 10.
3. In light of the same, Police authorities are directed to act in accordance with law, keeping in mind, the injunction order passed by the trial court below.
4. If advised, the petitioner may file a proper application before the trial court for further reliefs.
5. With the aforesaid observations / directions, the writ petition is disposed of. December 16, 2025 Lokesh Kumar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilendra Kumar Goswami Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Arun Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench