SHYAM SUNDER CHAUDHRY v. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRIN SECY P.W.D.AND 3 ORS
WRIA/1492/2006 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187763 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187763 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 1492 of 2006 Court No. - 25 HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
1. List has been revised.
2. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
3. Learned Standing Counsel for the State is present.
4. The matter is quite old and it pertains to the year 2006.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. December 16, 2025 Ashish Dewal Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Surendra Prasad Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) :
C.S.C., I.P.Singh (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) Shyam Sunder Chaudhry .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Through Prin Secy P.W.D.And 3 Ors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH DEWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench