SMT. NIRMALA ARORA WIFE OF LATE SHRI K.K. ARORA v. MANOJ BENIWAL SON OF SHRI NATHU SINGH BENIWAL
CW/7935/2025 · 2025-05-22
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18776 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18776 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7935/2025 Smt. Nirmala Arora Wife Of Late Shri K.K. Arora, Aged About 75 Years, Resident Of A-309, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur At Present Resident Of A-1, G-0-2, Tulip Orange, Sector- 70, Gurgaon. ----Petitioner Versus Manoj Beniwal Son Of Shri Nathu Singh Beniwal, Resident Of Pura Ki Dhani, Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu, At Present Resident Of A-309, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhaskar Sharma For Respondent(s) :
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 22/05/2025
1. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the Rent Tribunal, Jaipur Metropolitan-II to decide the eviction application No.279/2023 filed by the petitioner under Section 9 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 2001”) within a time frame.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a senior citizen of the age of 76 years and she has filed an application under Section 9 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001, in the year 2023, for eviction of the respondent. Counsel submits that the said application is lying pending for its adjudication, so appropriate directions be
(2 of 2) [CW-7935/2025] issued to the Tribunal to decide the said application expeditiously within a time frame.
3. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record.
4. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, while deciding the Criminal Appeal No.3589/2023 has deprecated the practice of the Courts of issuing directions to the subordinate Courts to decide the matter in a timeline.
5. The aforesaid directions cannot be issued by this Court. But looking to the fact that the petitioner is a senior citizen of the age of 75 years, it is expected from the Rent Tribunal to make all possible endeavours to decide the eviction application expeditiously.
6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/4