Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187756 (ALL)

M/S GARUDA SECURITY SERVICE THRU. ITS DIRECTOR / PARTNER PRAYAGRAJ v. SUVIGYA SINGH KARMCHARI PRATIKAR AYUKT AVAM SAHAYAK SHRAMAYUKT U.P. PRATAPGARH

CAPL/3735/2025 · 2025-11-18

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3735 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. Heard. 2. The present contempt application has been preferred against the alleged non compliance of order dated 27.03.2025, the same is quoted herein below:- "1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer : "Issue an order or direction thereby commanding the Opposite Party No. 2 i.e. (Karmchari Pratikar Ayukt Avam Sahayak Shramayukt, U.P., Paltan Bazar, Pratapgarh, (U.P.). to decide the Application dated 27.02.2025 in Case No. 01 / 2025 ( Lovely Singh & another Vs. Dr. Sonelal Patel & Others), within stipulated period, as early as possible, contained herewith as Annexure No. 1 to this petition in the interest of justice." 3. Considering the prayer limited to the issue of mandamus, the writ petition is disposed off directing the opposite party no.2 to decide the aforesaid application expeditiously in accordance with law. " 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted a copy of the order passed in the writ petition has already been served on 16.05.2025, but till Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Milan Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : M/S Garuda Security Service Thru. Its Director / Partner Prayagraj .....Applicant(s) Suvigya Singh Karmchari Pratikar Ayukt Avam Sahayak Shramayukt U.P. Pratapgarh .....Opposite Party(s) date, the application has not been decided and is still pending. Hence, the respondent is liable to be punished under the provisions of the Code of Contempt Act for willfully and intentionally disobeying the order passed in the writ petition. 4. After hearing learned counsel for the applicant and going through the record, it is found that on 14.10.2025, an order has been passed by the respondent, the copy of which has been enclosed as Annexure No.4 to the paper book wherein, the respondent has taken a decision on the application of the applicant by giving findings that the said issues raised by the applicant are interconnected with the issues framed in the case, so they will be heard simultaneously, meaning hereby that the application of the applicant has been decided. 5. From the facts, circumstances and discussion made herein above, no contempt is made out. The present contempt application is hereby dismissed. November 18, 2025 Preeti CAPL No. 3735 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench