RAMANDEEP SINGH ALIAS RAMANDEEP SINGH SANDHU v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/5230/2025 · 2025-05-14
Anoop Chitkara
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18775 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18775 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
219 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-5230-2025 Date of Decision: 14.05.2025 Ramandeep Singh @ Ramandeep Singh Sandhu ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondent CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Nirmaljeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate Mr. Jasjeet Singh Virk, Advocate and Mr. Balraj Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Akshay Kumar, A.A.G., Punjab. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections 29 04.06.2024 Phool
District Bathinda, Punjab 307, 341, 323, 506, 148, 149 IPC (Sections 201, 325 IPC added later on)
1. The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking anticipatory bail.
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the above captioned FIR has already been quashed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 02.05.2025 passed in CRM-M No.64505 of 2024.
3. Given above, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. In case, for any reason, the above captioned FIR is restored, then the police shall give atleast 05 Court working days notice to the petitioner to avail his legal remedies. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 14.05.2025 Jyoti Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No. 1 Jyoti Sharma 2025.05.16 11:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh