Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187749 (ALL)

M/S SARVSHREE UMA SHIVAM ENTERPRISES THRU.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ABDUL HASSAN HALEEM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. TAX AND REGISTRATION LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/1606/2025 · 2025-12-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT TAX No. - 1606 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 28.04.2024 passed under Section 73 of the GST Act as well as the order dated 17.10.2025 whereby the appeal was dismissed. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that no opportunity of hearing was granted while passing the order under Section 73. 4. Learned Standing Counsel, based upon instructions, states that in the show-cause notice, same date was mentioned for personal hearing and date of filing of the reply. 5. It is argued that the said issue was dealt with by this Court in Writ Tax No.303 of 2024 (Mahaveer Trading Company vs. Deputy Commissioner, State Tax and Anr.) vide judgment dated 04.03.2024. 6. On the said sole ground, following the judgment in the case of Mahaveer Trading Company (supra), present petition is allowed. 7. Orders dated 28.04.2024 & 17.10.2025 are quashed. 8. Matter is remanded to the assessing authority to pass fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. December 16, 2025 S. Kumar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar,J.) M/S Sarvshree Uma Shivam Enterprises Thru.Authorized Representative Abdul Hassan Haleem .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Tax And Registration Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench