HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8206 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Sanjay Kumar Rao and Shri Raghuveer Singh, Advocate on behalf of opposite party no.2 is taken on record. Heard, learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State, Shri Sanjay Kumar Rao and Shri Raghuveer Singh, learned counsels for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record. By means of the instant application, the applicants have prayed for quashing of the entire criminal proceedings of Special Sessions Trial No. 24495/2023 (Criminal Case No. 24495/2023), arising out of Case Crime No. 164/2022, under Sections 147, 406, 420, 504 & 506 IPC, Police Station Bijnaur, District Lucknow pending before A.C.J.M. IInd Lucknow on the basis of compromise executed between the parties on 22-08-2025. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that due to certain misunderstanding, the instant F.I.R. was lodged against the applicants. He added that later on, the parties sat together and have amicably settled their disputes, which has been reduced in writing on 22.08.2025. Thereafter, the applicants filed an Application U/S 482 No. 7385 of 2025 dated 03.09.2025, wherein this Court has directed the court below to verify the said compromise deed and in compliance thereof, the compromise deed was verified on 12.09.2025. He submits that now there is no dispute in between the parties and they have settled their dispute. He submits that further criminal proceedings in the instant matter would amount to harassment and, thus, the instant criminal proceedings arising out of Case Crime Crime No.164 of 2022 may be quashed. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has also supported the version of the learned counsel for the applicants and submits that parties have amicably settled their dispute and the opposite party no.2 has no grievance, hence, criminal proceedings against the applicants may be dropped. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Gautmi Srivastava, Santosh Kumar Choudhary Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Raghuveer Singh Ajay Singh @ Ajay Singh Yadav @ Golu And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the submissions aforesaid. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I find that compromise has been entered into between the parties on 22.08.2025 and said compromise has been verified on 12.09.2025 and, now, as per the statement of learned counsel for the parties, they do not want to press the aforementioned criminal proceedings relating to Case Crime No.24495/2023. In view of the above, as the applicants and opposite parties have entered into compromise on 22.08.2025 and no grievance remains to be agitated and, as such, further criminal proceedings in the aforementioned criminal case are liable to be set aside in view of the Judgments of the Apex Court rendered in B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another (2003) 4 SCC 675; Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (2008) 9 SCC 677; Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others, (2008) 16 SCC 1; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303; and Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab (2014) 6 SCC 466. Accordingly, entire criminal proceedings of Special Sessions Trial No. 24495/2023 (Criminal Case No. 24495/2023), arising out of Case Crime No. 164/2022, under Sections 147, 406, 420, 504 & 506 IPC, Police Station Bijnaur, District Lucknow are hereby quashed. The compromise shall be part of this order. The application is allowed accordingly. Consigned to records. September 25, 2025 Haseen U. A482 No. 8206 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench