Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18769 (GAU)

ABDUL KARIM v. SMTI. NIROJ PROBHA DAS and ORS

RSA/126/2010 · 2025-03-02

Devashis Baruah

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010199112010 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : RSA/126/2010 ABDUL KARIM VERSUS SMTI. NIROJ PROBHA DAS and ORS W/O LATE CHINTAHARAN DAS. 2:SMTI. SABITA RANI DAS S/O LATE CHINTAHARAN DAS ARE THE PERMANENT RESIDENTS OF LOWAIRPOA P.O. LOWAIRPOA P.S. PATHARKANDI DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM. 3:SMTI. NAMITA RANI DAS W/O SRI ABANI KANTA DAS AT PRESENT RESIDING AT PWD QUARTER MAIN ROAD KARIMGANJ ASSAM. 4:SMTI. SABITRI RANI DAS W/O SRI JYOTIRMOY DAS ADVOCATE SETTLEMENT LINK ROAD KARIMGANJ TOWN P.O. and DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM. 5:SMTI. JUGAMAYA DAS Page No.# 2/2 W/O SRI GAURANGA DAS OF KAILASHAHAR P.O. KAILASHAHAR DIST. NORTH TRIPURA TRIPURA. ALL THE RESPONDENTS ARE REPRESENTED BY 6:NARAYAN CHANDA S/O SRI RADHIKALAL CHANDA OF ROYNAGAR KARIMGANJ TOWN KARIMGANJ ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.A M MAZUMDAR, MR.A ALI,MD.S ISLAM,MR.F K R AHMED,MR.A K TALUKDAR Advocate for the Respondent : MS.M DUTTA, MRSA CHAKRABORTY,MR.S K CHAKRABORTY,,MR.P K ROY BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 03.03.2025 It is seen that on 07.02.2020, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has stated that the sole appellant had died and therefore sought for time. Subsequent thereto till date even after period five years no application has been filed for substitution of the legal representative. Considering the above, the instant appeal abates and accordingly, stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant