Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18765 (ALL)

FARHAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/1241/2025 · 2025-02-17

Deepak Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:22992 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1241 of 2025 Applicant :- Farhad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shakil Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. 181 of 2024, under Sections 76, 115(2), 351(2), 333, 352 B.N.S., Police Station- Kotwali Dehat, District- Bijnor. 3. Allegation alleged in the first information report is that named accused persons have physically assaulted the informant. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case being father of the main accused, Adnan. Investigating Officer has submitted charge- sheet against the applicant and Court concerned has taken cognizance and issued summons. He next submitted that on perusal of statements of the victim, no offence under alleged sections is made out. Lastly, it is submitted that the applicant is apprehensive of imminent arrest. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he would not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate with the investigation. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail application of the applicant and submitted that statements of the victim recorded under Sections 181 & 183 B.N.S.S., are supporting the prosecution story and applicant is named in the first information report. Prima facie, offence is made out against the applicant. Hence, applicant should not be released on anticipatory bail. 5. Considered the submissions raised by learned counsel for the parties and perused the entire record. From perusal of contents of first information report as well as other material evidence available on record, prima facie, offence is made out against the applicant, as such, no case for interference by this Court is made out. 6. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is rejected. Order Date :- 18.2.2025 Aditya Digitally signed by :- ADITYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad