Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187649 (ALL)

RISIKESH KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIA/14099/2025 · 2025-09-25

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14099 of 2025 Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dewendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main prayer:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authority to make payment of the salary to the petitioner month to month for the post of Assistant Teacher L.T. Grade, in the Institution namely Janta, Uchchtar Madhyamik Vidyalaya Baikunthpur at Noonkhar, Deoria, U.P. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authority to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 29.03.2025." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made innocuous prayer that his representation dated 29.03.2025, which is pending before respondent no.4, may be directed to be decided in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Saurabh, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh detailed representation along with the present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.4, District Inspector of Risikesh Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Schools, Deoria, within 10 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.4 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. September 26, 2025 Pratima (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) WRIA No. 14099 of 2025 2 Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad