Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187640 (ALL)

RAMMILAN YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/12214/2024 · 2025-01-08

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:4702 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 12214 of 2024 Applicant :- Rammilan Yadav And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Sri Vinod Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicant no. 2, namely, Ram Prasad, has been arrested by the police, as such, the instant anticipatory bail application has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application on behalf of the applicant no. 2 stands dismissed as infructuous. 3. Heard learned counsel for the applicant no. 1 and learned A.G.A. for the State. 4. The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant no. 1 in Case Crime No. 326 of 2024, under Sections 115/2, 352, 109 B.N.S., Police Station- Rani Ki Sarai, District- Azamgarh. 5. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant no. 1 have not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant no. 1 expeditiously. 6. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicant no. 1. 7. Accordingly, the relief as sought by the applicant no. 1 through this application is refused. 8. Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicant no. 1, it is directed that if applicant no. 1 surrender before the concerned Court below within two weeks from today and apply for regular bail, their bail applications shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922. 9 For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant no. 1 before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him. 10. With the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application on behalf of the applicant no. 1 stands disposed of. Order Date :- 9.1.2025/Aditya Digitally signed by :- ADITYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad