Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187608 (ALL)

DHARMSHILA SHARMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/14836/2025 · 2025-09-25

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14836 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the Respondent no.2 District Inspector of Schools, Mau to ensure the appointment and joining of the petitioners on the post of Peon in their allotted institution i.e. Darululoom Niswan Inter College, Mau or any other institution in District Mau, within stipulated period, as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioners may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Sri R.P. Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondents, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Adarsh Singh, Indra Raj Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Dharmshila Sharma And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) petitioners as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Petitioners are directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 within 10 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.2, District Inspector of Schools, Mau is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. September 26, 2025 Atul WRIA No. 14836 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad