RATTAN SINGH AND ANOTHER v. SALEEM AHMED XEN PMGSY DODA AND OTHERS
CCP(S)/24/2024 · 2025-03-25
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1876 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1876 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CCP(S) No. 24/2024
Rattan Singh and Anr.
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None q
vs
Saleem Ahmed Xen. PMGSY Doda and ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Nisha Kangotra, Advocate
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 25.03.2025
The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on 17.05.2024, 09.08.2024, 16.12.2024 and same is the position today as well. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the instant contempt petition. Even otherwise also, the instant contempt petition has been preferred against interim order passed by this Court dated 29.12.2023 in WP(C) No. 2428/2023. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioner is no longer interested in prosecuting the present contempt petition.
Accordingly, the proceedings in the instant contempt petition are closed.
Rule, if any, shall stand discharged.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
Jammu 25.03.2025 Sushant
19