Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18758 (HP)

Anil Sharma v. Seema Devi Nirmal and Another

CMP.M/1109/2025 · 2025-09-01

Sushil Kukreja, Vivek Singh Thakur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Anil Sharma Vs. Seema Devi & another CMP(M) No.1109 of 2025 01.09.2025 Present: Mr. Ravneet Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant- appellant. None for the respondents. CMP(M) No.1109 of 2025 Despite service, there is no representation on behalf of the respondents. On previous date also, there was no representation on their behalf, however, on said date, the matter was adjourned for today. It appears that the respondents are not interested in contesting this application. For the reasons stated in the application and submissions made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant, delay of 36 days in filing the appeal, is condoned. Application is allowed and disposed of. FAO(FC) No.___ of 2025 (FAO(FC)ST/18894/2025 Be registered. Notice to respondents, returnable for next date, on taking steps within one week, be issued. Records be requisitioned. List on 25.11.2025. ( Vivek Singh Thakur ) Judge ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge September 01, 2025 (V.Himalvi)