Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187579 (ALL)

M/S S.K. CONSTRUCTION v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/22736/2025 · 2025-07-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 22736 of 2025 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard Ms. Vatsala, learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Standing Counsel for State respondent and Shri Dhananjay Awasthi, learned counsel for Gorakhpur Industrial Development Authority (in short "Authority"). 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for quashing the impugned order dated 20.06.2025 passed by respondent no.3 and for a direction to respondents not to encash two bank guarantees dated 17.08.2023. 3. In response to the directions issued on 18.07.2025 and 27.01.2026, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed the supplementary affidavit, which is taken on record. The supplementary affidavit has been filed bringing on record the status of contractual work assigned to the petitioner under e- tender. She submits that civil work, electrical work, road work, ACP cladding, lift work, paver block, plaster and other works have been completed. Detailed information has been given regarding the construction work. She submits that in view of the tender, the petitioner has already carried out the work diligently and, as such, the direction be issued to the respondent to withdraw the blacklisting order. She submits that Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Kant, Vatsala Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dhananjay Awasthi M/S S.K. Construction .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) till date, no such formal order has been passed for recalling the blacklisting order. 4. Confronted with this, learned counsel for Authority prays for some time to obtain instructions qua the averments made in the supplementary affidavit. 5. On his request, the matter is adjourned. 6. Put up this matter again as fresh on 16.04.2026. 7. It is expected that, meanwhile, the Authority may process the claim of the petitioner in accordance with law. March 24, 2026 Priya WRIC No. 22736 of 2025 2 (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRIYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad