Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187540 (ALL)

GUNJAN TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. BASIC EDUCATION U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/13385/2025 · 2025-11-20

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13385 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Nitish Shekhar, learned counsel for the State appearing for opposite parties no. 1 & 3, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, Sri Aruun Kumar Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 4 and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main relief :- "i) ) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No. 2 to post the petitioner in any Primary School of Block Ganj Muradabad of District-Unnao." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no.2/Secretary, Basic Shiksha Parishad, U.P. Prayagraj and the opposite party no. 2 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties has no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Ehtesham Khan, Abha Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ran Vijay Singh, Rishabh Tripathi Gunjan Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Education U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 2/ Secretary, Basic Shiksha Parishad, U.P. Prayagraj within the period of 10 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 2 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of six weeks, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of. November 20, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 13385 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench