Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187532 (ALL)

RAVINDRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WPIL/2879/2025 · 2025-09-24

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2879 of 2025 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. Short counter affidavit filed by Shri Rajiv Kumar Mishra, learned counsel on behalf of the respondent No.6 is taken in the record. Shri Brajesh Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel appears for the petitioner. Shri Prem Bahadur Singh, learned counsel holding brief of Shri Rameshwar Prasad Shukla, learned counsel appears for the respondent No.5-Gaon Sabha. Shri Rajiv Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent No.6 submits that the order dated 25.05.2023 passed by the competent authority under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has been taken in the appeal before the competent authority. The aforesaid appeal is accompanied with an application for interim relief and is registered as Appeal No.D202575060004164 (Ramji v. Tehsildar (Judicial), Sagari, Azamgarh and another). It is however contended that the stay application is not being decided till date and the demolition notice has been served upon the respondent No.6. In the wake of the preceding discussion, the following directions are issued to the appellate authority: I. The appellate authority shall decide the application for interim relief within a period of 15 days. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brajesh Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rajiv Kumar Mishra, Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Ravindra Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) II. The authorities are restrained from taking action in pursuance of the demolition notice till the decision of the stay application in the appeal. III. The appeal registered as Appeal No.D202575060004164 (Ramji v. Tehsildar (judicial), Sagari, Azamgarh and another) shall be decided within a period of three months. The aforesaid appeal shall be decided independently and without being influenced by any observation made in this order. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is finally disposed of. September 25, 2025 Ashish Tripathi WPIL No. 2879 of 2025 2 (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad