Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18750 (KAR)

SMT RADHA K L v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/8090/2025 · 2025-06-12

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20156 WP No. 8090 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.8090 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT.RADHA K.L. D/O LATE LAKSHMANGOWDA, W/O JAYAPRAKASH NARAYAN K.S, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RESIDING AT K.S.R AGRAHARA, NEAR VEERABHADRESHWARA CHOULTARY, KUNIGAL TOWN, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 130. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SIDDAMALLAPPA P.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LAND REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, PANDAVAPURA SUB-DIVISION, PANDAVAPURA, MANDYA DISTRICT, PANDAVAPURA - 571 434. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, PANDAVAPURA TALUK, PANDAVAPURA, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 434. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20156 WP No. 8090 of 2025 4. SRI. SUNIL K. S/O K.L.NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT KIKKERI VILLAGE, KIKKERI HOBLI, K.R.PET TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 423. 5. SMT. SUVARANA, D/O K.L.NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT KIKKERI VILLAGE KIKKERI HOBLI K R PET TALUK MANDYA DISRICT - 571423. 6. SRI. K.L.NARAYANA S/O LATE LAKSHMANEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT KIKKERI VILLAGE, KIKKERI HOBLI, K.R.PET TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 423. 7. SRI.K.L.MOHAN, S/O LATE.LAKSHMANEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT KIKKERI VILLAGE, KIKKERI HOBLI, K.R.PET TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 423. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20156 WP No. 8090 of 2025 NO.2 IN CAE NO. R.MISC.(K) 03/2024 DATED 23.02.2024 AS PER ANNEXURE-G. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents 1 to 3. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioner is questioning the order dated in case No.R.Misc.(K) 03/2024 dated 23.02.2024 (Annexure-G) on the file of the respondent No.2. 4. Smt. Navya Shekar, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent- State raised preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of the writ petition, stating that, - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20156 WP No. 8090 of 2025 efficacious remedy is available to the petitioner under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. 5. In that view of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case the case, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach the competent authority under Section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for redressal of his grievance. All the contention of the parties are kept open. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35