- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11762 WP No. 36782 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 36782 OF 2018 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. ANJANEYA S/O. ERANNA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 2. H. TIMMAPPA S/O. HANUMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 3. SAROJAMMA W/O. RAJANNA, AGED 45 YEARS 4. V THIMMAPPA S/O. VEERANNA, AGED 44 YEARS 5. SANJEEVAPPA S/O. NETTAKALLAPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 6. SAKAMMA W/O. TIMMAPPA, AGED 45 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT CHITHRANAYAKANA HALLI, TALUKU HOBLI, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HARISH GANAPATHY., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11762 WP No. 36782 of 2018 AND: 1. HULAPPA S/O. RAMABHOVI, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, 2. NINGARAJ S/O. HULLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 3. ANJANEYA S/O. HALAPPA, AGE 38 YEARS, RESPONDENTS R/AT CHITRANAYAKANA HALLI, CHALLEKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. 4. THE LAND GRANT COMMITTEE BY ITS SECRETARY, THE TAHASILDAR, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITHRADURGA. 5. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA SUB DIVISION, CHITHRADURGA 6. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA DISTRICT, CHITHRADURGA …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA., AGA FOR R-4 TO R-6; SRI. M.H.SAWKAR., ADVOCATE FOR R-2 AND R-3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF R-6 DATED 20.6.2018 AT ANNEX-E AND ALSO QUSH THE R-5 ORDER DATED 14.5.2007 AT ANNEX-D WHICH IS CONFIRMED BY R-6, ETC. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11762 WP No. 36782 of 2018 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. A statement was made on 19.02.2025 that a physical amendment was carried out and an amended petition was filed. 2. However, it is noticed that the said statement is not correct, neither the physical amendment was carried out nor an amended cause title has been filed as per the Note of the Registry. 3. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 4. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE HNM, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23