Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187470 (ALL)

ARCHANA SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P.THRU PRIN.SECY.BASIC EDU.CIVIL SECTT.LKO.and ORS.

WRIA/18783/2016 · 2025-12-05

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 18783 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State, Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, counsel for respondent no. 3 and Dr. Uday Veer Singh, counsel for respondent no. 5 are present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. December 5, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajay Kumar, Vindhyawashini Kumar (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Archana Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lko.And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench